Fate of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) through two full-scale wastewater sludge incinerators.

Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are an emerging issue in wastewater treatment. High-temperature thermal processes, incineration being time-tested, offer the opportunity to destroy and change the composition of PFAS. The fate of PFAS has been documented through wastewater sludge incinerators, including a multiple hearth furnace (MHF) and a fluidized bed furnace (FBF). The dewatered wastewater sludge feedstock averaged 247- and 1280-µmol targeted PFAS per sample run in MHF and FBF feed, respectively. Stack emissions (reportable for all targeted PFAS from MHF only) averaged 5% of that value with shorter alkyl chain compounds comprising the majority of the targeted PFAS. Wet scrubber water streams accumulated nonpolar fluorinated organics from the furnace exhaust with an average of 0.740- and 0.114-mol F- per sample run, for the MHF and FBF, respectively. Simple alkane PFAS measured at the stack represented 0.5%-4.5% of the total estimated facility greenhouse gas emissions. PRACTITIONER POINTS: The MHF emitted six short chain PFAS from the stack, which were shorter alkyl chain compounds compared with sludge PFAS. The FBF did not consistently emit reportable PFAS from the stack, but contamination complicated the assessment. Five percent of the MHF sludge molar PFAS load was reported in the stack. MHF and FBF wet scrubber water streams accumulated nonpolar fluorinated organics from the furnace exhaust. Ultra-short volatile alkane PFAS measured at the stack represented 0.5%-4.5% of the estimated facility greenhouse gas emissions.

Transformation of organic carbon through medium pressure (polychromatic) UV disinfection of wastewater effluent during wet weather events.

An observed decrease in total organic carbon (TOC) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations following wastewater disinfection with medium pressure (MP, polychromatic) ultraviolet (UV) irradiation during wet weather flows is investigated. When antecedent rainfall in the previous 7-days was >2 in (5 cm), TOC and DOC concentrations decreased dramatically following MP-UV disinfection. Organic carbon surrogate measurements of biological oxygen demand (BOD), TOC, DOC, turbidity, UVA - 254 nm, SUVA (specific UVA), scanning UV-Visible spectra (200-600 nm), fluorescence excitation-emission matrix (EEM) spectra, and light scattering data are presented for wastewater resource recovery facility (WRRF) influent, secondary effluent (pre-UV-disinfection), and MP-UV-disinfected (final effluent) samples. TOC and DOC in wastewater influent and secondary effluent (i.e., pre-UV disinfection) correlated with antecedent rainfall conditions. The percent TOC and DOC removal through secondary treatment (i.e., from influent to effluent pre-UV) and the percent TOC and DOC removal through MP-UV disinfection (i.e., from effluent pre-UV to effluent post-UV) were compared and the latter approached 90 % through MP-UV disinfection during high antecedent rainfall conditions. Spectroscopy (UV, visible, or fluorescence) was performed on samples after filtration through 0.45 µm filters, i.e., the operationally defined DOC fraction of aquatic carbon. Scanning UV-visible spectra indicated transformation of an unidentified wastewater component into light-scattering entities regardless of antecedent rainfall conditions. The types of organic carbon (diagenetic, biogenic, or anthropogenic) and the significance of wet weather are discussed. An organic carbon contribution via infiltration and inflow was attributed as a source-of-interest in this research.

Application of a fluorescence EEM-PARAFAC model for direct and indirect potable water reuse monitoring: Multi-stage ozone-biofiltration without reverse osmosis at Gwinnett County, Georgia, USA.

Periods of drought coupled with increasing population growth have prompted increased interest in potable water reuse in Gwinnett County, Georgia, USA. However, such inland water recycling facilities are challenged with treatment approaches where reverse osmosis (RO) membrane concentrate disposal is a barrier to implementation of potable reuse. To evaluate alternative treatment processes, testing of two side-by-side pilot systems using multi-stage ozone and biological filtration without RO was conducted to compare indirect potable reuse (IPR) to direct potable reuse (DPR). Two water sources were investigated-influent from Lake Lanier for the IPR pilot, and a blend of 25 % reclaimed water mixed with lake water (75 %) for the DPR pilot. To assess the nature of organic matter removed during potable reuse, excitation-emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence spectroscopy/PARAllel FACtor (PARAFAC) analyses were examined as a fingerprinting tool. The objectives were to determine (a) if a DPR scenario, when preceded by advanced wastewater treatment, could achieve drinking water quality comparable to IPR and (b) if water quality monitoring using EEM/PARAFAC methods could predict results for DPR and IPR water quality, comparable to parameters obtained in a supplementary study that required more expensive, time-consuming, and complicated analytical techniques. Sample scores representing relative concentrations of fluorescing organic matter derived from the EEM-PARAFAC model decreased in the order of reclaimed water > lake water > DPR pilot > IPR pilot, demonstrating that EEM/PARAFAC could distinguish between DPR and IPR water quality. An assessment of a comprehensive list of individual organic compounds (reported separately) validated that blend ratios of 25 % reclaimed water, or higher mixed with lake water (75 %) did not meet primary and secondary drinking water standards. Likewise, in this study, EEM/PARAFAC analysis demonstrated the 25 % blend did not provide drinking water quality indicating this simple, inexpensive method could be used for potable reuse monitoring.

High-temperature technology survey and comparison among incineration, pyrolysis, and gasification systems for water resource recovery facilities.

Solids from wastewater treatment undergo processing to reduce mass, minimize pathogens, and condition the products for specific end uses. However, costs and contaminant concerns (e.g., per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances [PFAS]) challenge traditional landfill and land application practices. Incineration can overcome these issues but has become complicated due to evolving emissions regulations, and it suffers from poor public perception. These circumstances are driving the re-emergence of pyrolysis and gasification technologies. A survey of suppliers was conducted to document differences with technologies. Both offer advantages over incineration with tailored production of a carbon-rich solid, currently less stringent air emission requirements, and lower flue gas flows requiring treatment. However, incineration more simply combines drying and thermal processing into one reactor. Equipment costs provided favor pyrolysis and gasification at lower capacities but converge with incineration at higher capacities. Long-term operational experience will confirm technology competitiveness and elucidate whether pyrolysis and gasification warrant widespread adoption. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Pyrolysis and gasification systems are gaining traction in the wastewater industry with several full-scale installations operating, in construction, or design Several advantages, but some disadvantages, are considered in comparison with incineration Organic contaminants, including PFAS, will undergo transformation and potentially complete mineralization through each process.

Pyrolysis and gasification at water resource recovery facilities: Status of the industry.

Wastewater treatment generates solids requiring subsequent processing. Costs and contaminant concerns (e.g., per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances [PFAS]) are challenging widely used landfilling and land application practices. These circumstances are partly driving the re-emergence of pyrolysis and gasification technologies along with beneficial reuse prospects of the char solid residual. Previously, technologies experienced operational challenges leading to revised configurations, such as directly coupling a thermal oxidizer to the reactor to destroy tar forming compounds. This paper provides an overview of pyrolysis and gasification technologies, characteristics of the char product, air emission considerations, and potential fate of PFAS and other pollutants through the systems. Results from a survey of viable suppliers illustrate differences in commercially available options. Additional research is required to validate performance over the long-term operation and confirm contaminant fate, which will help determine whether resurging interest in pyrolysis and gasification warrants widespread adoption. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Pyrolysis and gasification systems are re-emerging in the wastewater industry. Direct coupling of thermal oxidizers and other modifications offered by contemporary systems aim to overcome past failures. Process conditions when coupled with a thermal oxidizer will likely destroy most organic contaminants, including PFAS, but requires additional research. Three full-scale facilities recently operated, several in construction or design that will provide operating experience for widespread technology adoption consideration.

Development of a fluorescence EEM-PARAFAC model for potable water reuse monitoring: Implications for inter-component protein-fulvic-humic interactions.

Measuring the surrogate parameters total organic carbon and dissolved organic carbon (TOC/DOC) is not adequate, alone, to reveal nuances in organic character for optimizing treatment in potable water reuse. Alternatively, analyzing each organic compound contributing to the surrogate measurement is not possible. As an additional analytical tool applied between these extremes, the use of excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy with PARAllel FACtor (EEM-PARAFAC) analysis was investigated in this research to track categories (components) or families of organic compounds during treatment in recycled water schemes. Although not all organic molecules fluoresce, many do, and fluorescence helps track their fate through water treatment processes. The sites investigated in this research were Lake Lanier, in Gwinnett County, Georgia, USA; the F. Wayne Hill Water Resources Center (FWH WRC) advanced wastewater treatment facility; and two pilot facilities operated in parallel representing the current indirect potable reuse (IPR) scheme as well as a pilot that evaluated direct potable reuse (DPR). A four-component nonnegativity PARAFAC model-elucidating protein-like (including tyrosine- and tryptophan-like fluorescence in a single component), soluble microbial product (SMP)-like, fulvic-like, and humic-like components-was fitted to the data. Each of the four components was spectrally and mathematically separated, implying that the fluorescing SMP-like component was not comprised of protein-, fulvic-, or humic-like components. PARAFAC excitation loadings with dual (double) pairs of fluorescing regions centered at the same emission wavelengths but different excitation wavelengths oriented parallel to the excitation axis and perpendicular to the emission axis were attributed to individual PARAFAC components. Significantly, the observation of PARAFAC emission loadings with multiple peaks-where the protein-like component exhibited fluorescence in both protein and fulvic/humic regions-is proposed to signify an intermolecular energy transfer (< 10 nm). Correct identification of EEM-PARAFAC components is fundamental to understanding water treatment.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances thermal destruction at water resource recovery facilities: A state of the science review.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a recalcitrant group of chemicals and can be found throughout the environment. They often collect in wastewater systems with virtually no degradation prior to environmental discharge. Some PFAS partitions to solids captured in wastewater treatment which require further processing. Of all the commonly applied solids treatment technologies, incineration offers the only possibility to completely destroy PFAS. Little is known about the fate of PFAS through incineration, in particular, for the systems employed in water resource recovery facilities (WRRF). This review covers available research on the fate of PFAS through incineration systems with a focus on sewage sludge incinerators. This research indicates that at least some PFAS destruction will occur with incineration approaches used at WRRFs. Furthermore, PFAS in flue gas, ash, or water streams used for incinerator pollution control may be undetectable. Future research involving full-scale fate studies will provide insight on the efficacy of PFAS destruction through incineration and whether other compounds of concern are generated. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Thermal processing is the only commercial approach available to destroy PFAS. Thermal degradation conditions required for destruction of PFAS during incineration processes are discussed. Fate of PFAS through water resource recovery facility incineration technologies remains unclear. Other thermal technologies such as smoldering combustion, pyrolysis, gasification, and hydrothermal liquefaction provide promise but are in developmental phases.

Fluorescence and Quenching Assessment (EEM-PARAFAC) of de Facto Potable Reuse in the Neuse River, North Carolina, United States.

The Neuse River, North Carolina, U.S., exemplifies a typical de facto potable reuse scenario, where drinking water sources are located downstream of treated wastewater effluent discharges. The study results imply that planned potable water reuse, whether in an indirect or direct potable reuse scenario, might provide better control over water quality than the status quo conditions. Using fluorescence excitation-emission matrix (EEM) measurements, anthropogenic influence of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) discharge was observed in samples near the location of drinking water treatment plant (WTP) intakes, eight or more miles downstream of the WWTP, implying that anthropogenic compounds were not fully removed or degraded by natural processes in this reach of the river. PARAllel FACtor (PARAFAC) analysis supported a two-component model of humic-like and nonhumic-like dissolved organic matter (DOM). A nonmodeled anthropogenic feature was also indicated. Significantly, the quenched fluorescence of humic-like DOM (static and/or dynamic quenching) by nonhumic-like DOM-previously demonstrated for probe molecules but first reported here in a natural/anthropogenic-influenced system-offers exciting insight into studies of humic/nonhumic interactions with important implications for pollutant fate and transport, sensing applications, and water treatment. A molecular spectroscopic explanation for dual fluorescing peaks in amino acids and humic substances is postulated.